joreth: (Dobert Demons of Stupidity)
What bad thing happened to you to make you hate god so much?

Well, besides the fact that it is impossible for me to "hate" something that I think of as a fictional character in a particularly poorly written collection of essays, nothing.  I've led a pretty charmed life.  My monogamous parents got married after my mother graduated high school and they've been married ever since.  They're still together and they still love each other.  I had a younger sister, I grew up in the suburbs, got good grades in school, had great teachers, a best friend, and a dog.  I went to private school for high school and got accepted to the college of my choice.  I started dating when I was 16, but I had "boyfriends" as early as 13.  I wasn't abused, I wasn't beaten, my parents loved each other and they loved us kids, I had both sets of grandparents until I was an adult, I had aunts and uncles and cousins to grow up with, I went to church every Sunday and I sang in the choir in high school as well edited the church paper and was a youth group leader.

There was really nothing very exceptionally wrong about my life at all.  It wasn't all roses and candy either.  I had all the usual troubles that middle-class kids do who happen to grow up in one of the wealthiest nations in the world in one of the best economies in its history.  I got bullied, but no more than many other kids at my school and I also had friends who stuck up for me.  I struggled in some of my classes, but way less than most kids and I pulled a 3.33 GPA throughout my scholastic career.  I wasn't particularly gifted at sports, but I wasn't the last to get chosen for teams either, and I even took home a couple of ribbons and trophies.  I argued with my parents and got grounded and spanked but mostly I had a pretty good relationship with them and I consider my parents to be people I can talk to and people I can trust.  I had extended family die, mostly people I didn't know very well, and I had pets and even a couple of good friends in my own age group die, but everyone faces death at some point in their lives, and I was old enough to understand death by the time anyone close to me died.

I just never believed in god.

Oh, to be sure, I did believe in all kinds of wacky things growing up.  Some of those wacky things didn't get dispelled until well into my 20s.  But I just never believed in a personal, sentient god who could be personified or who cared about me in particular.  I desperately wished there was one, but I didn't believe there was.  I suppose, since I believed in Santa Claus, there must have been a time that I believed it when I was told there was a god, but I lost that belief so early and so non-traumatically that I have no memory of ever having believed in a god.  In fact, my lost belief in Santa was far more traumatic (that's a story of how I started on the path to skepticism, but that's a tale for another time).

I do happen to remember the day I stopped believing in the church as an institution of good, though.  I can't tell you how old I was, except that it was prior to 4th grade.  The only reason I know that is because we switched churches when we moved during the summer between 3rd and 4th grade, and my memory of leaving the church is associated with the layout of our first church, and the second church was very different in appearance.

Also, prior to 4th grade and that move, I was a frequent visitor at the public library.  It was in walking distance of our house, and my babysitter's house, so I went often, but was too far to walk after the move, so I didn't go much again until I got a car.  Normally, a kid my age had a child's library card, that restricted us to a certain limit on books and kept us out of the adult book section.  But I had actually read everything in the kids section and I got a special dispensation to have an adult library card.  That upped my limit to 25 books checked out at one time (which I always had maxed out) and introduced me to Stephen King and Dean Koontz.  One of the reasons why I wanted the adult card was because I had completely exhausted all the children's "scary" books, including one old tome of classic scary stories that exposed me to Edgar Allen Poe.  When the librarian learned that, not only had I read all the Poe in the library I could find, but I wasn't scared and I understood it, she let me check out the adult horror.

This is related, I swear.

I remember sitting in the pew in church sometime prior to 4th grade and we had reached the part in the service of the Responsorials - that's the part where the priest says a line and the congregation says a scripted line back to him in response:

Priest: "Lift up your hearts"
Congregation: "We lift them up to the Lord"
Priest: "Give thanks to the Lord our God"
Congregation: "It is right to give Him thanks and praise"

So there I was, sitting in the pew, dozing off, waiting for the next round of songs (the only part of mass that I liked), when I heard the responsorial.  Of course, I'd heard it before - I'd been hearing it every weekend for my entire life.  But for some reason, that week it occurred to me that the congregation sounded just like a Stephen King novel.  I looked up, and everyone was reciting the same words, in the same monotone, with the same glazed look on their faces as if they weren't even aware of what they were saying.  No, I didn't become convinced that I had just woken up to Attack Of The Body Snatchers, but the comparison to a mind-stealing horror story was very clear and distinct in my mind that day.  It was that last line that really did it: "it is right to give Him thanks and praise" - how creepy is that?

When I was in first grade, I devoured the Ramona Quimby books, and continued to do so until I reached the end of the series.  In the first or second book, Ramona goes to first grade and learns to sing the national anthem.  She was so proud of herself to be like her big sister, Beezus, whom she idolized!  In the song, Ramona falls for a mondegreen, which is where you mistake the lyrics to a song for something else.  "Excuse me while I kiss this guy" is the most often cited mondegreen, for Jimi Hendrix' lyric "excuse me while I kiss the sky".

Anyway, Ramona thinks the lyrics to the Star Spangled Banner include "dawnzer lee light", which she thinks is some sort of lamp, instead of "dawn's early light".  In her haste to prove what a big girl she is and what she learned in school that day, she suggests to Beezus that she turn on the dawnzer when her sister complains that night is falling and it's getting dark in the house.  When Beezus has no idea what she's talking about, Ramona gets all puffed up with self-importance that she knows something her smart big sister doesn't know.  When it all comes out where the miscommunication is, Ramona is mortified and humiliated.

That story always stuck with me.  I hate being wrong, so I don't like to make very many declarative statements without checking and double checking.  So, back to being in 1st grade, where we learned the Pledge of Allegiance.  We were taught the Pledge by rote, without being explained what we were pledging to.  I don't even think anyone bothered to explain what a "pledge" itself was, nor what "allegiance" was.  So, with the story of Ramona in the back of my brain, in 1st grade I decided that I did not understand this thing called the Pledge of Allegiance, and I could not, in good conscience, recite it until I understood what it meant rather than just parroting back the appropriate sounds.  How did I know I wasn't saying "dawnzer lee light" somewhere when I was supposed to be saying "dawns early light"?  Because of that, I have never pledged my allegiance, although I can recite it the way I can recite many song lyrics and movie lines.

Fast forward to that day in church with the zombie-robot responsorials.  I thought that no one in that church really understood what they were saying.  Maybe they knew what the words all meant, but they didn't sound like they meant them.  And if the grownups were all just saying things by rote, then how could I possibly understand what I was saying?  With a precedent already set from the Pledge situation 3 years earlier, I decided that I couldn't recite any more church stuff until, not only did I understand the meanings of the words, but until I fully and wholeheartedly believed in what I was saying.

And that was the last time I ever said a recitation in church again.  The older I got, and the more I understood the meanings of the words, the less belief in those words I had and the more disgust I had in the church itself, for its apparent hypocrisy and attempted dominion over its congregation, including contradictory and outright immoral teachings.  That was sometime before fourth grade.  But I continued to attend church with my family (I really loved the music and I looked forward to the doughnut and orange juice every week), and I voluntarily joined another church in high school to sing in the choir.  While in the choir, I volunteered to perform on special occasions when the priest felt a "play" was better than just him reading from the book, and I also volunteered to edit their paper and to lead the youth ministry.  All without believing in any gods, and all with the priest and the entire choir aware of my lack of belief.

There was no scandal in my church that I ever knew about - no priest raping kids, no hidden love child, no gay "luggage boy", no embezzlement.  The priests were kind and compassionate and forgiving and funny and approachable, the choir and the congregation was tolerant and friendly, and the youth ministry even specifically sought me out to give the safe sex class (I was already studying marriage counseling by then and had quite an extensive education on human sexuality, which my priest knew, and it was felt that the younger kids would listen to an older teen more readily than an adult, so I gave comprehensive sex ed to my youth group - none of this abstinence-only shit).

I wasn't the only atheist at church either.  In fact, I wasn't the only atheist in my choir.   But we sang our songs and went on retreats and ministered to the other youth and engaged in philosophical debate with each other.  Nothing bad ever happened with relation to church or god, and nothing really bad ever happened in general to make me blame a god or get angry about it.  I just never believed, and as I got more exposure to the doctrine, I stopped having faith in the goodness of the institution too.

Date: 9/1/11 09:02 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] leora.livejournal.com
I am still angry at being taught to recite the pledge of allegiance and told to say it every single day (we were not informed that it was a choice) and never being taught what it meant. I did not know what the words meant when I was taught it, and when I went home and asked what some of the words meant, I felt betrayed when I was informed that "pledge" meant something akin to a promise and that they had tricked me into declaring a promise that I did not agree to and did not even understand.

I also consider it incredibly unethical to ask any child to make a pledge of allegiance - they are simply too young. To ask such of a child does only one of two things. It is either an evil binding of one too young to choose freely and reasonably or it is a belittling of what a pledge of allegiance is by making it clear that breaking it is of no meaning or consequence and thus having a child recite one has no harm to it.

I also do not hold with religious organizations that ask for lasting oaths from young children, but I consider it especially inappropriate that my state-run school did so.

That was in kindergarten, and just became one more of many reasons why as a child I did not trust adults and almost never went to them for anything important. There were a few other incidents that helped with that mentality, but that was one of the earlier ones. Adults were nice and all, but they'd betray you casually and in a friendly manner. I really wish we didn't do such things to children.

Date: 9/1/11 07:50 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] leora.livejournal.com
I would mouth the words, but the reason I mentioned not being told it was a choice is that legally, it is required that it be optional. I do not consider it to be a true option if you are not informed it is optional. Given that basically everything else in school is not optional, I think they should be required to tell you that this is optional. By not doing so, they put children into a much worse situation then they should be in if they do not want to do it, and do not present children with the notion of thinking about whether they want to do it for those for whom it does not come naturally. So, I consider that a second failing and betrayal on the part of the school.

If they actually threatened you with punishment, that is fairly serious. That never happened to me, but then, nobody knew I wasn't saying it. If that had happened to me and my parents found out, then they'd have given the school Hell. But I am annoyed with my parents for not informing me that the pledge was optional too. It didn't occur to them - even though I am the third generation in a row to have an objection to the pledge (each for a different reason). My father and my father before him all objected to the pledge of allegiance too. So, I was unknowingly following a family tradition when I got upset about it the very day I was taught it. But I discussed the matter with my sisters and not my father, so the info just didn't come out that it was voluntary. I didn't find out it was voluntary until years of putting up with it quietly, and then I just didn't care that much. Which still bothers me.

Date: 9/1/11 09:08 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] leora.livejournal.com
Legally, I am under the impression that it is optional. It is one of the protected rights of children. However, whether institutions actually honor that right is an altogether different matter. There are many rights that students have in public schools that are not honored. Also, this only applies to public schools, obviously. A private school can make what rules it wants.

However, it is de facto not very optional since I've never heard of a school informing students that it is optional. Much like I learned afterward that other aspects of my education were either optional or I could have insisted that they could not be factored into my grade (that was New York specific state laws though, not country-wide), but since I didn't know my rights, I didn't effectively have them. This is a common problem for children. The issue in the latter case is that NY has (or, at least had, an interesting law that grades in classes had to reflect the teacher's estimate of the student's ability in the subject matter the class claimed to be covering and could not be affected by other factors. That is, they could not dock your grades for things like discipline, attendance, or other academic performance unless it was explicitly a part of the subject of that class. I did not know this though at the time, which was extremely annoying, as it meant I could not get out of the extremely painful and time-wasting penmanship I was forced to do in my Middle School science class for no good reason other than that I had a Middle School science teacher who was very finicky about exactly how we did things. But I couldn't take advantage of my rights as I didn't know I had them. Same for the pledge.

Children do have some interesting free speech protections (and some lack thereof) while in public schools. But pretty much nobody will tell them that, and how are they supposed to find out they have them?

Date: 9/1/11 09:37 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] leora.livejournal.com
I learned most of these things from my older siblings. My older older sister is a lawyer now, and before that was always interested in law. My older older brother is not a lawyer, but was interested in law. Both of my brothers have always been ... interesting. Discipline problems certainly... but in the smart, bored kid sort of way. They pushed limits if they didn't respect them and they wanted to know what they could get away with. Since we were raised libertarian/objectivist and generally are an argumentative bunch, it came much more naturally to them to learn what the actual rules were. They would sometimes use these against the system. But they didn't pass on enough of that knowledge to me or enough of it soon enough for me to always take advantage of it, especially as I have always been much more rules-following and a "good kid" by nature. When I was inclined to go against the system, I usually did it by not letting the system know I wasn't following the rules (which I had to do to protect myself, and I would do when the system tried to actively harm me, which it often would do, but I generally only did in self-defense). I pretty much only took an open stand against the system once and that was fifth grade against a substitute teacher, and that was because she was being openly hostile to the entire class and I felt I had to do something to protect my classmates. And I knew that my parents would support me, which might not be true for my classmates. It worked out quite well though as I had a pretty much flawless record as a "good kid" and my teacher supported me as well. My brothers would not have been able to pull that off in that way, because they wouldn't have been automatically trusted the way I was. My being reported for a discipline issue was simply bizarre to the point that each time it happened the person who reported me got into trouble (and each time it happened the person who reported me had been in the wrong, so that was fair).

But because I stayed below the radar only once did a teacher actually find out that she tried to make me do something that was actively harmful to me. She apologized though, and I informed her that I hadn't done it anyway. I still respect that she apologized to me and told me she would trust me in the future. I have so much more respect for her than many of the other adults who just went around insisting on things and assuming they always knew more or always knew what was right.

Oh, and on a side note, my brothers are brilliant and all, but they were so prone to annoying teachers and causing problems that we had to move before I started High School. The guidance counselor of the school they went to had threatened to take out his dislike of my family on me, even though I had never done anything to him and he didn't know me. He said I would never get into any honors classes in his school. Given that I was an honors/AP student that would have been massive sabotage in pure vengeance. I admit my brothers were massively annoying, but that doesn't justify that. But yeah, my brothers did try to learn stuff about what they were actually legally allowed to do. It turns out that insisting on your rights combined with being smart, cocky, and generally annoying kids does not make you liked. Especially one who can ace classes without doing homework. Some of my older older brother's teachers really liked him because he knew the material and others didn't like him because he didn't put effort in. He would only do homework if he felt he could learn from it, so he did very little work and did very well on his tests. Then he insisted he be graded on his knowledge of the subject matter. My younger older brother was a bit less academically inclined, so he only did homework that interested him. His abilities always lay elsewhere and he was busy running his own business and didn't care that much about school anyway. And they totally were obnoxious teens. Oh and it didn't help that my older older brother started school early and stuff so he was going through his classes way young, so he really was less mature. I don't know all the details, but he started college at 16. So, yeah, a lot of teachers hated him. Which says something very sad about our culture.

Date: 9/1/11 01:06 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] terriaminute.livejournal.com
I remember editing the pledge of allegiance as I saw fit, or just not saying it. I have edited what I did and said all my life to fit my own perceptions. I think it's weird that everyone doesn't do that. Consciously I mean. Deliberately. With intent to be self-honest. Most people, I notice, edit all right, but it is subconscious, and too often more to appear not-wrong than to maintain self-honesty. I saw quite a lot of that in church. Lots of people allow others to do their thinking for them, and will hang onto what they "know" thereby because it is easy, and safe. I despise that, primarily because I have done the same stupid thing, but learned better.

I know how to fit in if I want to do that, but I do it to avoid confrontation where that would cause more trouble than I'm prepared for, rather than as a lie to myself.

As for the things we do to children, I have found it impossible to teach my son about religion without the atheist take on them. I tried. But I just can't do it. I am not impartial. I feel lucky to have a logical child. I feel he's lucky to have a Catholic best friend. They each accept the other as-is at this point, as children often do. I wonder if they will ever discuss their respective philosophies.

Date: 9/1/11 01:23 pm (UTC)From: (Anonymous)
I was raised as a Jehovah's Witness. Jehovah's Witness children are generally taught not to recite the pledge because it is believed that one should only pledge allegiance to God. Not that Jehovah's Witnesses are any better than any other religion.

I find it remarkable that you were thinking so logically at such an early age. I officially became a Jehovah's Witness (dedicated my life) at the age of 11 (which I find ridiculous now, how could I make such a decision with such limited knowledge), and didn't lose my faith completely until I was 25. As early as my preteens, I felt the religion I was being raised in was logically the correct choice, not really recognizing that I was coming to that conclusion based on heavy indoctrination and very limited sources.

In my opinion, religion generally serves people's emotional needs. But somehow, it came to me primarily as a logical choice. So when I finally started looking at other sources of information, the belief structure started to break down.

Date: 9/1/11 08:49 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] james-the-evil1.livejournal.com
Funnily enough it's thanks to the JWs that children CAN legally opt out of saying the Pledge. The JWs fought it in court because it's a violation of their principles to pledge to anyone other than "god," and the court ruling basically said NO child, religious reasons or not, could be forced to say it... tho many still are.

Date: 9/1/11 09:12 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] leora.livejournal.com
And that's part of what annoys me about our society. We given token rights to children to pacify their parents. But we still view it as fine to disrespect the children themselves and treat them as puppets.

There's no need to tell the children themselves that they can opt-out, because the ones whose parents care about them opting out will inform their own children. And when you are making a pledge of allegiance - an oath of fealty - why should it matter whether or not you choose it if your parents are okay with it? Why don't we just have betrothals for 5 year olds and not inform them that marriage is a choice that requires consent? Or that some people consider promises to have some sort of meaning and value to them.

Date: 9/1/11 05:02 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] darkgods.livejournal.com
You always post the most fascinating things.

I came from a very religious family. A large, southern religious family. The fact that I am openly pagan has caused no end of controversy and consternation. I have even been "kidnapped" for a weekend and taken to a retreat in an attempt to rescue my soul. I was livid with my father and his wife for months. Like you, I had worked often with the youth in the family church. My family knew that I was pagan, and even the youth knew I was pagan, but I had a rich Christian upbringing and it wasn't difficult for me to teach them about the Christian deity. After their stunt of kidnapping me, I withdrew from the family church. I respected their beliefs; I still don't understand why they can't respect mine.

Date: 9/2/11 02:25 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] bikil.livejournal.com
I was raised Pagan and my Mom told me to not say "god" during the pledge because we did not believe in that "god." She said to not make a big deal out of it, but to simply mouth that one word. The other kids picked it up, told the teacher, and I got sent to the principal's office. The principal called in my Mom and told her with sadness what I had done. Upon hearing that it was my Mom's decision for me to not say the word "god," the principal suggested we both needed therapy. This was in the 70's in Utah, so I sincerely hope it's better today, but this shows that even if I was told the pledge was optional, it is NOT optional socially. If you are the only one not saying it in a class, there will be social consequences.

When I was around 7 or 8, my Mom and Stepfather converted to being Barn-again (wheee). I swallowed it for a few years, but at about 12, started asking all kinds of questions and was not satisfied with the answers. I became disillusioned with religion and stopped going to church. Looking back, one of the things that horrifies me the most is how I became barn-again. We were in Sunday school (I was 8) and were told that we would have a fun art activity that day that would make our parents proud of us! We were going to color re-birth certificates for those of us who had accepted Jesus into our hearts. But ONLY the ones who had accepted Jesus could color. So, I did it in order to color, and the teacher was right, my parents were obviously very proud of me, with happy tears in their eyes that I had joined them in their beliefs. It makes me sick now to think about how I was basically coerced into doing something like that.

Anyway, I ramble, but I also wanted to say that during the call and response part this is what was going through my head:
Weeee love the leeeeeeder. Hee!

Banners
























OSZAR »